Tuesday 26/November/2024 – 01:45 PM
Today, Tuesday, the Cairo Criminal Court of Appeal, sitting in the Fifth Settlement, postponed the session of the mass murderer’s appeal of his death sentence, in the case of killing 3 women and having intercourse with them after death, to the next November 28 session for the coroner to hear.
The mass murderer appeals his death sentence
The session witnessed the arrival of Karim Selim, known in the media as the “Thug of the Assembly,” under heavy security guard, to the Cairo Criminal Court held in the Fifth Settlement. To complete his appeal against his death sentence on charges of killing 3 women after having sexual intercourse with them before and after their death, and taking video clips of them during the intercourse.
The court’s vicinity witnessed tightened security in preparation for the start of the trial session of the mass murderer, who is accused of killing 3 women and disposing of their bodies on the desert road.
For his part, lawyer Ashraf Farahat, defending Lubna, the ex-husband of the assembly, commented on her failure to attend the appeal submitted by the butcher of the assembly against his death sentence on charges of killing 3 women after having intercourse with them before and after death, explaining that his client, the ex-husband of the murderer, will not attend today’s session because there is no point in her presence, which is not It changes the description of the crime in some way.
The lawyer of the ex-husband of the mass murderer after she failed to attend the appeal hearing
The defense of the ex-husband of the mass murderer continued: Requesting the presence of the ex-wife of the mass murderer for the appeal hearing is nothing but the aim of the accused’s defense to extend the litigation period, indicating that the court inquired about this request of the mass murderer’s defense and the defense informed us of the character of the accused.
Farhat explained how she was separated from him two or more years before committing the crimes, in addition to the fact that there is an impediment to relying on this testimony, whatever its content, due to the existence of previous judicial disputes, as the accused had previously accused her of adultery and his ex-wife was acquitted in the case.
